<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Website Host Reviews &#187; StumbleUpon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://websitehostreview.com/category/stumbleupon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://websitehostreview.com</link>
	<description>The ultimate web hosting review site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Isn&#8217;t Stumbleupon Sending My Site Any Web Traffic?</title>
		<link>http://websitehostreview.com/why-isnt-stumbleupon-sending-my-site-any-web-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://websitehostreview.com/why-isnt-stumbleupon-sending-my-site-any-web-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StumbleUpon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitehostreview.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might have read about how much web traffic StumbleUpon can send blogs with interesting/ fun/ quality content. You might even have experienced such. However, when a friend asked why another friend&#8217;s site was not getting StumbleUpon traffic, I thought to look into it. There are several possible reasons for declining or no traffic from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might have read about how much web traffic StumbleUpon can send blogs with interesting/ fun/ quality content. You might even have experienced such. However, when a friend asked why another friend&#8217;s site was not getting StumbleUpon traffic, I thought to look into it. There are several possible reasons for declining or no traffic from StumbleUpon.</p>
<h3>Possible Reasons for StumbleUpon Not Sending Web Traffic</h3>
<p>The reasons listed below are only possible reasons, based on an educated guess and the discussions of other bloggers.<span id="more-203"></span></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Not enough &#8220;up&#8221; votes</strong> on your articles, possibly within a certain duration after submission.</li>
<li><strong>Too many &#8220;down&#8221; votes</strong> on your articles. Maybe your topic is of little interest to SU users, or of poor quality. Or someone doesn&#8217;t like you. (Ah the joys of social media.)</li>
<li><strong>Poor categorization</strong>. If you don&#8217;t have friends submitting your content/ articles, it&#8217;s hard to control which categories are being used to tag submissions. </li>
<li><strong>Delayed response</strong>. One of the benefits of StumbleUpon over, say, Digg, is that if your content goes popular, the traffic does not come all in a flood. SU spreads it out over a period of time. How long? Your guess is as good as mine. (If you know, feel free to comment.)</li>
<li><strong>Not enough activity</strong> from your user account. When you sign up, you can list your blog&#8217;s URL in your profile. If you then have someone else submit all your stories but you yourself are not submitting anything, this might be a factor. This is probably less likely, but SU does like to stimulate social behavior and get all members participating.</li>
<li><strong>You don&#8217;t submit enough articles</strong> and only vote on stories submitted by the same group of people over and over.</li>
<li><strong>Self-serving</strong>. If you&#8217;re submitting your own articles and nothing else, then you&#8217;re overpromoting yourself, which SU frowns on. It&#8217;s not very sociable.</li>
<li><strong>Exclusion</strong>. Someone asked SU to exclude the site (and somehow proved they were the owner).</li>
<li><strong>Your site or account is banned</strong>. (See the next section for reasons.)
</li>
</ol>
<h3>Why Your Site or SU Acount Might Be Banned</h3>
<p>If your stumbles are not showing up in your SU profile, <a href="http://www.cartoonbarry.com/2007/03/did_stumbleupon_ban_me.html">your account might be banned</a>. Here are some possible reasons for banning in SU.</p>
<ol>
<li>Too many different SU usernames <a href="http://www.conversationmarketing.com/2008/10/stumbleupon-banned-me.htm">voting from the same IP address</a>.</li>
<li>Reciprocal voting activity, based on tracked patterns or published confirmation (i.e., a blog post or social media campaign suggesting potential reciprocal voting activities)</li>
<li>Too many users voting on the same story and coming from the same referring URL &#8211; e.g., from a forum listing.</li>
<li>Misuse of the &#8216;send&#8217; button. The SU browser tool bar has a Send button that lets you message your SU friends on some content you&#8217;d like them to look at. If you you&#8217;re only sending them your stories, votes for your site <a href="http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-banned-using-stumbleupon/">could be discounted</a>.</li>
<li>Complaints. This is a pretty broad area, and there can be any sort of complaint from other users which might cause you problems on SU.</li>
<li>Other reasons. Missed anything above? Social media sites, no matter how open-minded, always seem to reserve a few reasons to ban someone.</li>
</ol>
<h3>Avoiding Being Banned on StumbleUpon</h3>
<p>Some <a href="http://blogsessive.com/blogging-tips/the-stumbleupon-witch-hunt/">bloggers think</a> StumbleUpon staff are being extreme, but to avoid being banned on StumbleUpon, <a href="http://ironblogger.com/how-to-not-get-banned-from-stumble-upon/">follow a few simple rules</a>:</p>
<ol>
<li>Submit interesting/ fun/ useful content. Spam will <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/stumbleupon_takes_a_lesson_from_digg_starts_banning_users.php">get accounts and sites banned</a>. Read articles carefully before submitting.</li>
<li>Submit (and vote up) content from multiple sites, <a href="http://www.terencechang.com/2007/07/19/are-you-banned-stumblupon-consequence/">not just yours</a>.</li>
<li>Stumble (preferably up) other content that has already been submitted to SU.</li>
<li>Avoid &#8220;incestuous&#8221; reciprocal voting. Sure, SU has a fairly small limit for number of friends, but don&#8217;t just vote for your close friends&#8217; submissions.</li>
<li>Avoid any sort of reciprocal voting patterns. The idea is to use SU &#8220;naturally,&#8221; not to market yourself. Marketing yourself <a href="http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/exchanging-stumbles-leads-to-stumble-upon-ban/">shows patterns</a> that many social media sites track for.</li>
<li>Avoid any sort of public campaign which might suggest reciprocal voting activity could follow. That might have been one of the reasons Darren Rowse&#8217;s very popular ProBlogger blog [<a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/08/01/how-social-media-helped-me-get-unbanned-from-a-social-media-site-in-one-hour-and-44-minutes/">was temporarily banned</a>] on SU.</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t vote from behind company firewalls. Many companies will only show one IP address, and that means all SU users in your company will show as a single IP. Even if it&#8217;s not intentional, it&#8217;ll unfortunately smell of marketing.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://websitehostreview.com/why-isnt-stumbleupon-sending-my-site-any-web-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

